Eight questions, about two minutes. What you get:
Your details are only requested at the end, before your result is shown.
Enter your details to see your indicative duration, how it compares to a manual migration, and the way of working that fits your situation.
Comparable programmes with automation applied typically run months from assessment to hypercare.
Indicative only, and not a quote. The traditional comparison assumes a manual programme of the same scope takes roughly times as long. Both ranges narrow sharply once an assessment has established real interface counts, dependencies and payload volumes.
You answered that you do not yet know what sits inside the mappings. That is not a gap in the assessment, it is a finding: unknowns are the single most common source of post-go-live surprises. Sizing them is the first thing an assessment does.
The same five phases, run manually or run with automation. The rows most relevant to your answers are highlighted.
| Phase | Done manually | With Rojo Migration Approach & Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Assess | Interviews and hand-tracing. Findings are only as good as what people still remember. | Mapping, orchestration and connection logic extracted from the source platform, with an AI-generated flow diagram per interface. You plan against what your landscape actually does. |
| Extract & generate | Each interface rebuilt by hand, inheriting whatever shape the old one happened to have. | Future-state artefacts generated against your templates, with error handling, logging and governance already applied. Often minutes per interface rather than days. |
| Validate | Hand-built test cases, thin coverage, gaps that surface in production. | Automated scenarios run against real captured payloads; any mismatch in mapping, routing or structure is flagged on execution. Up to 70% less manual regression effort. |
| Cut over | Sign-off based on judgement and hope. | Interface-level pass/fail dashboards both IT and the business can read. Go-live backed by evidence. |
| After go-live | Documentation drifts. Nobody is sure what the new landscape does either, and the next change starts from scratch. | You keep the interface documentation, the captured payloads and a validated baseline of how every interface behaves. The next change starts from something known. |
Automation handles what is mechanical. Knowing which interfaces to redesign rather than carry over, and spotting risk in something nobody has touched in years, stays a human call. Our consultants work alongside the tooling, not behind it.
Figures from a recent large-scale migration from legacy middleware to SAP Integration Suite. In a separate programme, a Boomi landscape grown over 15 years, with nobody left who built the original logic, moved with roughly 85% of the work automated.
Prefer to read first? See our automated migration approach or 5 lessons from migrations we have run.
Keep this page: the link in your address bar reopens this exact result.
We run Migration Studio against your landscape and hand your team the output: extracted interface documentation and flow diagrams, generated SAP Integration Suite artefacts built to your standards, and a repository of real payloads. Your people take it from there, reviewing and finishing the flows, running business validation and owning cutover. You get the automation benefit without taking on a tool to learn, because our team operates it throughout.
Your team and ours in one squad. We bring Rojo Migration Studio, the automation and the migration method along with our integration expertise and knowledge; your people keep the landscape knowledge and the ownership. Knowledge transfer is built into the delivery rather than bolted on at the end.
We run the migration end to end, from assessment through cutover and hypercare, and report progress at interface level throughout. Rojo Managed Services is the natural option for running the landscape afterwards.