Button Text

Four risks in a BizTalk migration, and how we remove each one

‍

None of them are about whether SAP Integration Suite is the right target. They are about whether hundreds of interfaces can move without breaking what already works.

Your XSLT logic is converted, not rewritten

BizTalk compiles custom functions and inline C# code into the generated XSLT, and SAP Cloud Integration won't run that C#. Migration Studio extracts your mappings, converts them to SAP CI-compatible XSLT with field structures and logic preserved, and validates compatibility automatically, then equivalence is proven by test, not by code review.

Every interface regression tested against BizTalk

Most BizTalk landscapes have no reusable test payloads, and BizTalk gives you little to extract them with, so sign-off becomes a matter of opinion. We build the payload repository first, then replay real payloads and compare output field by field against the BizTalk baseline, 50 to 100 automated scenarios per interface, with pass/fail dashboards your stakeholders sign off against.

Hidden logic found before the budget is fixed

Behaviour sits across orchestrations, mappings, custom pipeline components and Business Rules Engine policies, so an inventory built from interface names misses most of it, which is how migrations discover their real scope after the budget is fixed. A pre-project pilot spanning low to very high complexity surfaces it before you commit a number.

Your team reviews results instead of producing them

Migrations stall on capacity, not intent, and hand-testing hundreds of interfaces lands on the same people keeping the current landscape running. On our largest BizTalk programme, 60% of the migration was automated and manual regression effort dropped by up to 70%. Your team reviews results instead of producing them.

Why Rojo

Automation is what makes the difference on a migration

Two parts of a BizTalk migration take most of the time: converting mappings that were never meant to leave the platform, and proving the result still behaves the same.

Both have to be repeated for every interface, which is what stretches a timeline. We use our own tooling for both.

Rojo Migration Studio

Our own tooling, run by our consultants against your landscape. You get the benefit without buying a tool or training your team on one.
‍
✔ Extracts and analyses your existing XSLT mappings
✔ Converts them to SAP CI-compatible XSLT
✔ Preserves field structures and business logic
✔ Validates syntax and compatibility automatically

85% of the conversion work automated in one migration of interfaces built up over fifteen years.

Regression testing framework

The framework replays your real payloads and flags any mismatch in mapping, routing or payload structure during execution, not in UAT.
‍
✔ Field-level comparison against the BizTalk baseline
✔ Allowed deviations handled by configuration
✔ Runs unattended across the full test set
✔ Interface-level pass/fail dashboards for sign-off

Weeks → days on validation cycles, with up to 70% less manual regression effort.

And we won't migrate your technical debt

Every interface gets one of five decisions in the assessment, before any migration work starts. We work through your landscape interface by interface, rate each one for complexity, and agree the split with your team rather than handing it to you. On a decade-old landscape, retire and replace are usually bigger categories than anyone expects, which means the project is often smaller than the interface count suggests.

01
Migrate as is

Works, still needed, no redesign case. The category automation handles best.

02
Modernise

Worth keeping, but the pattern is dated. Nightly batch becomes real time, point-to-point becomes event-driven.

03
Migrate and redesign

Needed, but the current design doesn't belong on the target platform. Stateful orchestrations land here.

04
Replace with standard content

A prebuilt adapter already covers it. No reason to migrate custom code.

05
Retire

Every interface retired is one you never pay to migrate, test or run again.

01
Migrate as is

Works, still needed, no redesign case. The category automation handles best.

02
Modernise

Worth keeping, but the pattern is dated. Nightly batch becomes real time, point-to-point becomes event-driven.

03
Migrate and redesign

Needed, but the current design doesn't belong on the target platform. Stateful orchestrations land here.

04
Replace with standard content

A prebuilt adapter already covers it. No reason to migrate custom code.

05
Retire

Every interface retired is one you never pay to migrate, test or run again.