Migrate MuleSoft to SAP Integration Suite without rewriting your DataWeave logic
We move your Mule applications, DataWeave transformations and API layers onto SAP Integration Suite and prove each interface behaves the same before cutover, with automated regression testing instead of manual UAT.
%20(4541%20x%203027%20px)%20(4541%20x%201500%20px)%20(23).webp)
80%
Of the migration automated
Up to 50%
Less migration time
100K+
Integrations migrated
Certified
SAP Certified Migration Factory Partner
Four risks in a MuleSoft migration, and how we remove each one
None of them are about whether SAP Integration Suite is the right target. They are about whether hundreds of interfaces can move without breaking what already works.
Your DataWeave logic is converted, not rewritten
DataWeave is proprietary to MuleSoft and nothing on the target platform runs it, which is why most migrations treat every transformation as new development. Migration Studio reads your Mule application archive, extracts the DataWeave transformations and converts them with field structures and business logic preserved. Equivalence is then proven by test, not by code review.
Every interface regression tested against MuleSoft
Where MUnit coverage exists we use it, and where it doesn't we capture baselines from the running platform before anything moves. Real payloads are replayed and output compared field by field against the MuleSoft baseline, with interface-level pass/fail dashboards your stakeholders sign off against instead of an opinion.
Hidden complexity found before the budget is fixed
DataWeave scripts nest deeply, and behaviour also sits in connector configuration, error handling and the API layer above the flows. An inventory built from application names misses most of it, which is how migrations discover their real scope after the number is committed. A pilot spanning low to very high complexity surfaces it first.
Your team reviews results instead of producing them
Migrations stall on capacity, not intent, and hand-testing hundreds of interfaces lands on the same people keeping the current landscape running. With up to 80% of the conversion work automated, the effort your team spends moves from producing test evidence to reviewing it.
Automation is what makes the difference on a migration
Two parts of a MuleSoft migration take most of the time: converting DataWeave transformations that were never meant to leave the platform, and proving the result still behaves the same.
Both have to be repeated for every interface, which is what stretches a timeline. We use our own tooling for both.
Rojo Migration Studio
Our own tooling, run by our consultants against your landscape. You get the benefit without buying a tool or training your team on one.
✔ Reads your Mule application archive from Anypoint Platform
✔ Extracts and analyses your DataWeave transformations
✔ Converts them for SAP Integration Suite with field structures and business logic preserved
✔ Validates converted mappings for compatibility automatically
Up to 80% of the conversion work automated on.
Regression testing framework
The framework replays your real payloads and flags any mismatch in mapping, routing or payload structure during execution, not in UAT.
✔ Field-level comparison against the MuleSoft baseline
✔ Existing MUnit coverage reused where it exists
✔ Allowed deviations handled by configuration
✔ Runs unattended across the full test set
✔ Interface-level pass/fail dashboards for sign-off
Weeks → days on validation cycles, with up to 70% less manual regression effort.
And we won't migrate your technical debt
Every interface gets one of five decisions in the assessment, before any migration work starts. We work through the estate interface by interface, rate each one for complexity, and agree the split with your team rather than handing it to you. On a decade-old landscape, retire and replace are usually bigger categories than anyone expects, which means the project is often smaller than the interface count suggests.
Works, still needed, no redesign case. The category automation handles best.
Worth keeping, but the pattern is dated. Nightly batch becomes real time, point-to-point becomes event-driven.
Needed, but the current design doesn't belong on the target platform. Layered API-led designs and long-running stateful flows land here.
A prebuilt adapter already covers it. No reason to migrate custom code.
Every interface retired is one you never pay to migrate, test or run again.
Find out what your MuleSoft estate actually looks like
Most MuleSoft landscapes hold applications nobody owns, DataWeave scripts nobody has opened in years, and error handling nobody documented. Better to find them now than in month four.
%20(1450%20x%201020%20px)%20-%202026-08-24T134329.914.png)
.webp)
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MuleSoft to SAP CI Migration