Button Text

Four risks in a Boomi migration, and how we remove each one

‍

None of them are about whether SAP Integration Suite is the right target. They are about whether hundreds of interfaces can move without breaking what already works.

Your map logic is converted, not rewritten

Boomi map functions and process logic live as platform metadata rather than as code anyone can hand to a developer, which is why most migrations treat every transformation as new development. Migration Studio extracts your process and map components and converts them with field structures and business logic preserved. Equivalence is then proven by test, not by code review.

Every interface regression tested against Boomi

Boomi estates rarely carry a reusable test set, so we capture baselines from the running platform before anything moves. Real payloads are replayed and output compared field by field against the Boomi baseline, with interface-level pass/fail dashboards your stakeholders sign off against instead of an opinion.

Hidden complexity found before the budget is fixed

Logic hides in connector configuration, process properties and cross-references rather than in anything you can read end to end, and documentation is usually thin because the visual builder made writing it feel unnecessary. An inventory built from process names misses most of it, which is how migrations discover their real scope after the number is committed. A pilot spanning low to very high complexity surfaces it first.

Your team reviews results instead of producing them

Migrations stall on capacity, not intent, and hand-testing hundreds of interfaces lands on the same people keeping the current landscape running. With up to 80% of the conversion work automated, the effort your team spends moves from producing test evidence to reviewing it.

Why Rojo

Automation is what makes the difference on a migration

Two parts of a Boomi migration take most of the time: converting maps and process logic that were never meant to leave the platform, and proving the result still behaves the same.

Both have to be repeated for every interface, which is what stretches a timeline. We use our own tooling for both.

Rojo Migration Studio

Our own tooling, run by our consultants against your landscape. You get the benefit without buying a tool or training your team on one.
‍
✔ Reads your Boomi process and map components
✔ Extracts and analyses your map functions and process logic
✔ Converts them for SAP Integration Suite with field structures and business logic preserved
✔ Validates converted mappings for compatibility automatically

Up to 80% of the conversion work automated on.

Regression testing framework

The framework replays your real payloads and flags any mismatch in mapping, routing or payload structure during execution, not in UAT.
‍
✔ Field-level comparison against the Boomi baseline
✔ Baselines captured from the running platform before anything moves
✔ Allowed deviations handled by configuration
✔ Runs unattended across the full test set
✔ Interface-level pass/fail dashboards for sign-off

Weeks → days on validation cycles, with up to 70% less manual regression effort.

And we won't migrate your technical debt

Every interface gets one of five decisions in the assessment, before any migration work starts. We work through the estate interface by interface, rate each one for complexity, and agree the split with your team rather than handing it to you. On a decade-old landscape, retire and replace are usually bigger categories than anyone expects, which means the project is often smaller than the interface count suggests.

01
Migrate as is

Works, still needed, no redesign case. The category automation handles best.

02
Modernise

Worth keeping, but the pattern is dated. Nightly batch becomes real time, point-to-point becomes event-driven.

03
Migrate and redesign

Needed, but the current design doesn't belong on the target platform. Sprawling multi-branch processes and long-running flows land here.

04
Replace with standard content

A prebuilt adapter already covers it. No reason to migrate custom code.

05
Retire

Every interface retired is one you never pay to migrate, test or run again.

01
Migrate as is

Works, still needed, no redesign case. The category automation handles best.

02
Modernise

Worth keeping, but the pattern is dated. Nightly batch becomes real time, point-to-point becomes event-driven.

03
Migrate and redesign

Needed, but the current design doesn't belong on the target platform. Sprawling multi-branch processes and long-running flows land here.

04
Replace with standard content

A prebuilt adapter already covers it. No reason to migrate custom code.

05
Retire

Every interface retired is one you never pay to migrate, test or run again.